Showtime’s Weeds Star Mary-Louise Parker is a POSER
We’re proud to defend our STONER culture against yet another unauthentic POSER cashing in on it; this time around it’s some shamelessly weed-ignorant actress named, Mary-Louise Parker, the NON-POT SMOKING star of Showtime’s laughable portrayal of the “dangerous world of drug dealing” called Weeds. Showtime’s Weeds is STUFF STONERS DON’T LIKE and plagues the airwaves with rhetoric, misunderstanding, and judgment during the time of our nation’s greatest fight to end the ignorance and all-out Reefer Madness surrounding marijuana and the current WAR on DRUGS.
Give us a fucking break already, Hollywood…if you’re going to poach ideas from our culture why not actually employ an actress who is educated about weed or at least smokes the shit? Using some poser chick who thinks nowadays marijuana “doesn’t seem quite as contraband,” is maddening. Listen Parker-POSER, explain to us why there were 78,172 “criminals” arrested in the State of California for a substance that you consider not “quite as contraband” as it once was. Hello…In 2008 there were 78,514 weed busts, Mary Poser…and that’s the most busts since weed met decriminalization in California all the way back in 1976. So, uh…yeah.
“It’s like Sudafed,” said the ignorant Parker to the Boston Herald. Actually Paker, marijuana isn’t anything at all like Sudafed. It’s 100% safe and completely all natural where as Sudafed is a fucking chemical created by a fucking pharmaceutical company. And, before the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 people used to be able to convert the shit into crank! Get your facts straight, man. You’re in a position of influence, man. Because your pretty little face is blasted across the airwaves every week, people think you’re an authority on marijuana and shit. We know you’re not…but they don’t…so we take it as our responsibility to tell the world that the chick considered the matriarchal weed princess on TV DOESN’T KNOW SHIT ABOUT MARIJUANA! She’s as fake as Hollywood. Take some fucking responsibility and either start smoking weed or at least read a fucking book about the history of marijuana or something for chrissakes!
What’s really so frightening about this horribly irresponsible television show and this ignorant influential actress and these delusional writers is that they’re spreading PURPOSEFULLY hidden misinformation about marijuana that undermines our precious marijuana movement. PLUS their LAME portrayal casts STONERS and our STONER CULTURE, which they know NOTHING about obviously, in a negative light. According to Wikipedia, Weeds‘ Poser Parker’s character “Nancy Botwin was a loving, benevolent, all-American PTA soccer mom until her husband Judah suddenly dropped dead. To maintain the suburban lifestyle to which she was accustomed, Nancy entered the dangerous world of drug dealing. Her regular clients include…blah blah blah”.
Dangerous world of drug dealing? We thought Weeds was about WEED not DRUGS! How fucking misleading! Get your language right, dudes! Marijuana is an herb…Sudafed is a fucking drug, the world of Sudafed-derived meth is fucking DANGEROUS! We’ve been fighting marijuana prohibition and the type of Reefer Madness mentality this show perpetuates since the fucking 30′s, man, and a lame TV show like this does nothing but DESTROY our efforts all the while riding the wave of marijuana’s popularity.
Anyhow, man…YOU SUCK WEEDS and Mary Parker! You both suck for perpetuating harmful stereotypes that damage all the hard work we’ve all done to spread the truth about marijuana and our efforts to get the best herb on Earth into the hands of those who need or want it. Thanks a lot Mary-Louise Suzie Creamcheese for completely dismissing and miscatergorizing marijuana’s usefulness in your highly-valuable position of influence. Your ignorant admission just confirms there ain’t NOTHIN’ AUTHENTIC, worthwhile, or HONEST about Showtime’s WEEDS.
What do you think? Is Showtime’s WEEDS stuff stoners like or does it do harm to the marijuana community. Give us your thoughts in the comment section below.
Leave a Reply